<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SCOTUS Denies Navajo Nation Access to Water	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://clarion.unity-struggle-unity.org/2023-06-25-scotus-denies-navajo-nation-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://clarion.unity-struggle-unity.org/2023-06-25-scotus-denies-navajo-nation-water/</link>
	<description>The peoples hear our revolution&#039;s clarion call!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Society Behind the Court: The Federalists and the Supreme Court&#8217;s Fascist Blitzkrieg &#8211; The Red Clarion		</title>
		<link>https://clarion.unity-struggle-unity.org/2023-06-25-scotus-denies-navajo-nation-water/#comment-256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Society Behind the Court: The Federalists and the Supreme Court&#8217;s Fascist Blitzkrieg &#8211; The Red Clarion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2023 23:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clarion.unity-struggle-unity.org/?p=2108#comment-256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] In Haaland v. Brackeen, as we at the Clarion have already demonstrated, the court superficially ruled in favor of the Indian Child Welfare Act &#8212; but only so it could turn around and use that ruling as a pretext for stripping Indigenous nations of the last vestiges of political autonomy, the last pretenses sovereignty. The court did exactly that in Arizona v. Navajo Nation, decided only a few days later. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Haaland v. Brackeen, as we at the Clarion have already demonstrated, the court superficially ruled in favor of the Indian Child Welfare Act &mdash; but only so it could turn around and use that ruling as a pretext for stripping Indigenous nations of the last vestiges of political autonomy, the last pretenses sovereignty. The court did exactly that in Arizona v. Navajo Nation, decided only a few days later. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
